Response to ' Why no free replacement of worn-out IC?' (Straits Times Online, 19 Jun 2010)
IC replacement fee covers production cost
ST Online
19 Jun 2010
WE REFER to Mr Ng Tuck Kay's Forum Online letter, "Why no free replacement of worn-out IC?" (last Thursday).
The identity card (IC) is a polycarbonate card that has been subjected to stringent tests for durability. Nonetheless, we are aware that a small number of cards may be damaged due to excessive wear and tear and/or the way they are kept.
The $60 fee for replacing a damaged IC is to recover the production cost, which includes manpower, material, as well as other costs incurred in producing a new card. The fee has not been increased since the current polycarbonate IC was introduced in 1991.
Unlike the $60 replacement fee for damaged cards, the replacement fee for a lost IC is $100 for the first loss and $300 for the second and subsequent losses.
Chia Hui Keng (Ms)
Head, Public & Internal Communications
Corporate Communications Division
Immigration & Checkpoints Authority
Why no free replacement of worn-out IC?
ST Online
17 Jun 2010
I VISITED the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) recently to renew my passport. At the same time, I inquired about replacing my worn-out identity card (IC).
However, I was told that I would have to pay $60 for its replacement.
I was subsequently informed by the ICA in writing that the fee is a 'gazetted fee provided for under the National Registration Regulations' and that the card is made of a highly durable polycarbonate material 'not easily damaged with normal handling' and can be 'expected to last a lifetime if kept or handled properly'.
Given that our ICs are used for a wide range of things, it is perhaps a tad optimistic to expect them to last a lifetime.
Even if a fee has to be imposed, why is it almost identical to that of replacing a lost IC?
Ng Tuck Kay